<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugly Ubiquity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/</link>
	<description>i couldn&#039;t think of better name for this blog...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Labs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Major Ubiquity Update</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Labs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Major Ubiquity Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>[...] to the code found in Ubiquity 0.1.5. The team particularly wants to thank Yatrik Solanki, Abimanyu Raja, and Stephen Horlander for their work on envisioning and creating the skinning functionality and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the code found in Ubiquity 0.1.5. The team particularly wants to thank Yatrik Solanki, Abimanyu Raja, and Stephen Horlander for their work on envisioning and creating the skinning functionality and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Ubiquity Gets More Potent And Beautiful</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Ubiquity Gets More Potent And Beautiful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>[...] version of Ubiquity however is that it supports skinning which means you can now get rid of the ugly skin. The &#8220;skinlist&#8221; command will now take you to your Ubiquity skin page where you can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] version of Ubiquity however is that it supports skinning which means you can now get rid of the ugly skin. The &#8220;skinlist&#8221; command will now take you to your Ubiquity skin page where you can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abi</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>abi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Apologies for the late reply, everyone.

@David

There&#039;s a lack of documentation here. I&#039;ll ask around and file a bug for this. Btw, the visual glitches on OS X are reported in these two bugs:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445404

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469007

@Nox

Use this updated XPI https://ubiquity.mozilla.com/xpi/ubiquity-latest-beta.xpi

It&#039;s a release candidate and there *should* be no bugs in the error console. Changed how skins works a bit, so, I think it won&#039;t be buggy any longer. Yep, we could have some more &quot;standardized&quot; names.

@Irakli

Due to the lack of a better skin, we decided to go back with the same default skin but with a opaque background rather on a transparent only on Linux. It&#039;s hackish but it should do for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the late reply, everyone.</p>
<p>@David</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lack of documentation here. I&#8217;ll ask around and file a bug for this. Btw, the visual glitches on OS X are reported in these two bugs:</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445404" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445404</a></p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469007" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469007</a></p>
<p>@Nox</p>
<p>Use this updated XPI <a href="https://ubiquity.mozilla.com/xpi/ubiquity-latest-beta.xpi" rel="nofollow">https://ubiquity.mozilla.com/xpi/ubiquity-latest-beta.xpi</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a release candidate and there *should* be no bugs in the error console. Changed how skins works a bit, so, I think it won&#8217;t be buggy any longer. Yep, we could have some more &#8220;standardized&#8221; names.</p>
<p>@Irakli</p>
<p>Due to the lack of a better skin, we decided to go back with the same default skin but with a opaque background rather on a transparent only on Linux. It&#8217;s hackish but it should do for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aza&#8217;s Thoughts &#187; Ubiquity: Visual Identity</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Aza&#8217;s Thoughts &#187; Ubiquity: Visual Identity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s time to start thinking about refreshing its visual identity. Abimanyu Raja’s new skin support makes it possible for artists and designers to drastically change the way Ubiquity is presented to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s time to start thinking about refreshing its visual identity. Abimanyu Raja’s new skin support makes it possible for artists and designers to drastically change the way Ubiquity is presented to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubiquity 0.1.3 Preview: Faster, Prettier at Toolness</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubiquity 0.1.3 Preview: Faster, Prettier at Toolness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>[...] Raja&#8217;s new skin support makes it possible for artists to create new skins using just a bit of CSS. We don&#8217;t yet have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Raja&#8217;s new skin support makes it possible for artists to create new skins using just a bit of CSS. We don&#8217;t yet have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abimanyu Yusuf</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Abimanyu Yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>wow.. great works....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.. great works&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nox</title>
		<link>http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/ugly-ubiquity/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Nox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>@David
Transparency done by GTK (afaIk at least)
http://phoenix.nox.googlepages.com/ubi-shadow.png
Though, it&#039;s damn buggy and I agree that the partial transparency thing with images are really nice for usability purposes. If I remember correctly Compiz does that doesn&#039;t it? (Can&#039;t seem to get Compiz running at the moment so can&#039;t test for myself, not that this is &#039;on topic&#039; anyway...)

@abi
Thanks for the xpi, though I get an error message when using it and the commands refuse to load because of it.

Error: missing ; before statement
Source File: ubiquity@labs.mozilla.com/modules/sandboxfactory.js
Line: 1468, Column: 6
Source Code:
      let suggs = noun_type_email.suggest(text, html); 

Strange error... there&#039;s only 103 lines in that file :-/

Installing and changing skins work though, but appears to be buggy(?)

When it comes to third-party commands, aren&#039;t they able to use any html they want for the previews?
If so it could probably be left to the community to decide. Some &quot;standardized&quot; classnames would probably help, but otherwise the default style could be set by the command author and then it&#039;s up to the one writing the stylesheet whether he want to customize specific commands or not.

@Irakli
You can always make one yourself, or wait for someone to make one that you like ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David<br />
Transparency done by GTK (afaIk at least)<br />
<a href="http://phoenix.nox.googlepages.com/ubi-shadow.png" rel="nofollow">http://phoenix.nox.googlepages.com/ubi-shadow.png</a><br />
Though, it&#8217;s damn buggy and I agree that the partial transparency thing with images are really nice for usability purposes. If I remember correctly Compiz does that doesn&#8217;t it? (Can&#8217;t seem to get Compiz running at the moment so can&#8217;t test for myself, not that this is &#8216;on topic&#8217; anyway&#8230;)</p>
<p>@abi<br />
Thanks for the xpi, though I get an error message when using it and the commands refuse to load because of it.</p>
<p>Error: missing ; before statement<br />
Source File: <a href="mailto:ubiquity@labs.mozilla.com">ubiquity@labs.mozilla.com</a>/modules/sandboxfactory.js<br />
Line: 1468, Column: 6<br />
Source Code:<br />
      let suggs = noun_type_email.suggest(text, html); </p>
<p>Strange error&#8230; there&#8217;s only 103 lines in that file :-/</p>
<p>Installing and changing skins work though, but appears to be buggy(?)</p>
<p>When it comes to third-party commands, aren&#8217;t they able to use any html they want for the previews?<br />
If so it could probably be left to the community to decide. Some &#8220;standardized&#8221; classnames would probably help, but otherwise the default style could be set by the command author and then it&#8217;s up to the one writing the stylesheet whether he want to customize specific commands or not.</p>
<p>@Irakli<br />
You can always make one yourself, or wait for someone to make one that you like <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
